Prosecution Recalls Cases Of Anti-Corruption Demonstrators: Legal Experts Question Charges

In a surprising turn of events, Justice Jane Frances Abodo, the Director of Public Prosecutions, has taken a bold step by recalling the case files of nearly 100 demonstrators arrested during the anti-corruption march in Kampala City.

The reasons behind this decision remain shrouded in mystery, leaving many to speculate on the motives behind the chief government prosecutor’s actions.

Legal critique of charges against demonstrators

However Constitutional lawyers have raised concerns about the charges of being idle and disorderly and being a common nuisance, labeling them as outdated remnants of colonial rule.

Over the past two days, scores of demonstrators found themselves in court, facing charges of common nuisance and being idle and disorderly.

Despite denying the accusations, they were remanded in custody until the early days of the following month.

Understanding the offence of common nuisance

Section 148 of the Penal Code outlines the offense of common nuisance, emphasizing acts that cause annoyance, danger, or inconveniences to the public. Conviction can result in a jail term of up to one year.

Legal experts like Dr. Kabumba Busingye and human rights lawyer Nicholas Opiyo have criticized the use of archaic laws, highlighting the need to reform legislation that disproportionately impacts vulnerable communities.

Check also;

• Boda Boda Riders Warned Against Engaging In Unlawful Protests By Opposition
• International Anti-Corruption Day, How Far Is Uganda In This fight?

This is not a Paywall, but Newslex Point's journalism consumes a lot of time, hard-work and money. That's why we're kindly requesting you to support us in anyway they can, for as little as $1 or more, you can support us .

Please use the button below to contribute to Newslex Point, Inc. using a credit card or via PayPal.

Comments

comments